FOR SPECIALTY EDUCATION CENTERS WITH 2–10 LOCATIONS
Before you spend more on parent inquiries, find where the ones you already have stall.
The no-cost 30-minute Enrollment Leak Review helps you decide what to verify first: whether current inquiries are stalling inside the process or the center genuinely needs more inquiry volume. Wilson compares the same stages across your centers and sends a one-page summary with the first point to verify, three checks to run, and the next step. Missing information is marked, not guessed. No prep deck or polished CRM required.
No cost · 30 minutes on Zoom · no prep deck · one-page summary afterward

THE REVIEW STANDARD
- THE REVIEW COMES FIRST
- No paid Buildout is assumed.
- NO CAUSE IS GUESSED
- Known facts are separated from missing information; a cause is not guessed.
- THE SUMMARY IS YOURS EITHER WAY
- You receive it whether implementation is recommended or not.
This review is useful if
- You receive parent inquiries but still have open seats.
- Your team handles parent calls, consultations, or assessments.
- Response or follow-up varies by staff member or center.
What the review helps you decide
The review answers one practical question: should you improve the inquiry-to-enrollment process before adding more volume, or is insufficient inquiry volume genuinely the first constraint?
VERIFY THE INQUIRY-TO-ENROLLMENT PROCESS
Use when ownership, timing, follow-up, or next steps are inconsistent or unknown.
- Compare inquiry stages by center.
- Find the first point to verify.
- Confirm ownership, timing, and next steps.
VIEW 3 STEPSHIDE 3 STEPS
- Compare inquiry stages by center.
- Find the first point to verify.
- Confirm ownership, timing, and next steps.
Know what to verify before adding volume.
OR
VERIFY WHETHER INQUIRY VOLUME IS THE CONSTRAINT
Use when the process is consistent and visible.
- Confirm capacity by center.
- Verify the team can handle more inquiries.
- Choose where added volume belongs.
VIEW 3 STEPSHIDE 3 STEPS
- Confirm capacity by center.
- Verify the team can handle more inquiries.
- Choose where added volume belongs.
Know whether insufficient inquiry volume is the first constraint.
What happens in 30 minutes
Walk through the current process
Who responds, how consultations are booked, and what happens next.
Map what differs
Wilson compares the same stages by center, marks missing ownership or timing, and identifies the first point to verify, not a presumed cause.
Receive the one-page summary
After the call, Wilson prepares your one-page summary with the first point to verify, three checks to run, and the recommended next step.
COMPLETED SAMPLE REVIEW Constructed center data. The analysis and deliverable structure follow the actual Enrollment Leak Review process. This is not client data, a case study, or evidence of typical results.
Same 40 inquiries. Different movement.
Center comparison
Before centers are compared, the review confirms that each stage is counted the same way: inquiries, reached by staff, booked, completed, then enrolled. Response timing is supporting information, not a score.
| Center | Inquiries | Reached | Booked | Completed | Enrolled | Response timing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Center | 40 | 34 | 19 | 14 | 7 | Median first response: 22 minutes |
| Midtown Center | 40 | 31 | 17 | 11 | 5 | Median first response: 1 hour 45 minutes |
| West Center | 40 | 25VERIFY FIRST | 12 | 7 | 2 | Not tracked: missing information, not zero |
Across all three centers: 120 inquiries, 90 reached, 48 booked, 32 completed, and 14 enrolled.
FIRST POINT TO VERIFY
Parents reached by staff
- OBSERVED
- West Center recorded 25 of 40 inquiries reached, compared with 34 at North Center and 31 at Midtown Center.
- NOT YET KNOWN
- Whether every center counts “reached” the same way, and whether response ownership or timing explains the difference.
- VERIFY NEXT
- Confirm the counting rule, first-response owner, and response timing before changing staff, scripts, or inquiry volume.
- RESPONSIBLE ROLE
- Enrollment lead + West Center manager.
- PROPORTIONATE NEXT ACTION
- Assign first-response ownership and track response timing and next actions before increasing inquiry volume.
The visible difference is a point to verify, not proof of cause.
See what happened after bookingHide what happened after booking
BOOKED: 48
COMPLETED: 32
NOT COMPLETED BY THE REPORTING POINT: 16
WITH A DOCUMENTED NEXT ACTION: 5
WITHOUT A DOCUMENTED NEXT ACTION: 11
AFTER THE REVIEW
The review stands on its own. Use the summary with your team; discuss implementation only when the issue is material and you want support.
USE THE SUMMARY INTERNALLY
Verify the missing information and act on the next step with your team.
DISCUSS IMPLEMENTATION WHEN JUSTIFIED
Consider a 90-Day Buildout only when the issue is material and your team wants support.
Implementation can cover response standards, ownership, follow-up rules, reporting, and management rhythm.
No cost · 30 minutes on Zoom · no prep deck · one-page summary afterward
Please do not share student records or health information.